#SEBI #SEBIClarificationMutualFund #SEBIMutualFund #MFRebalancingRules
New directive brings uniformity in compliance timelines across all types of breaches, reinforcing investor protection
Mumbai: In a move aimed at reinforcing transparency and consistency in mutual fund operations, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on Thursday issued a clarification regarding the treatment of passive breaches in actively managed mutual fund portfolios. The clarification mandates that all passive breaches—irrespective of the cause—must be addressed within the same rebalancing timelines outlined in the SEBI Master Circular, specifically paragraph 2.9.
Understanding Passive vs. Active Breaches
In mutual fund portfolio management, a breach refers to a situation where the investment composition deviates from regulatory or scheme-specific limits. These breaches are categorized into active and passive:
-
Active breaches occur when fund managers deliberately or inadvertently invest outside the permitted limits, in violation of regulatory norms.
-
Passive breaches, on the other hand, are unintended and arise due to external factors beyond the control of fund managers. These could include:
-
Market-driven price fluctuations that change the relative weight of securities in a portfolio
-
Corporate actions such as mergers, demergers, or stock splits
-
Maturity of underlying debt instruments
-
Sudden, large-scale redemptions by investors affecting asset allocations
-
Despite being unintentional, passive breaches still impact the portfolio’s adherence to its investment mandate, potentially affecting risk exposure and investor expectations.
The Regulatory Clarification
In its latest circular addressed to mutual funds, asset management companies (AMCs), and trustees, SEBI stated:
“The provisions prescribed under paragraph 2.9 of the Master Circular shall be applicable for all types of passive breaches for the actively managed mutual fund schemes.”
This means fund houses are now obligated to correct all passive breaches within the same rebalancing timelines prescribed for other breaches. As per paragraph 2.9 of the Master Circular on mutual funds, this typically requires rebalancing to be done within 30 days of the breach, with some exceptions and reporting requirements if timelines are exceeded.
The clarification is rooted in recommendations made by SEBI’s Mutual Funds Advisory Committee (MFAC) and aims to bring greater consistency and regulatory discipline to fund operations. It also aligns with SEBI’s broader agenda of investor protection, ensuring that all types of deviations—intentional or otherwise—are treated with the same level of seriousness and urgency.
Legal Authority and Framework
The circular was issued under Section 11(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992, which empowers SEBI to protect the interests of investors in securities and to regulate the securities market. It also draws authority from Regulation 77 of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, which governs the powers of SEBI in issuing directions to mutual funds, AMCs, and trustees.
By invoking these regulatory frameworks, SEBI has reinforced that even passive breaches must be actively managed and rectified, thereby closing any interpretational gaps that may have existed previously.
Implications for the Industry
The clarification is likely to have a significant operational impact on fund houses and their compliance teams. While many AMCs already address passive breaches promptly, this circular formalizes the requirement of timely correction, regardless of the breach’s origin.
It also:
-
Eliminates ambiguity around treatment of passive breaches
-
Reinforces the accountability of fund managers and trustees
-
Ensures uniform compliance practices across the mutual fund industry
-
Enhances transparency for investors, who rely on the consistency of fund strategies and mandates
Mutual funds will now need to have robust internal systems in place to monitor real-time portfolio deviations, assess the nature of breaches, and ensure timely corrective actions within the defined period. This may involve enhanced data analytics, internal control mechanisms, and more frequent compliance reviews.
Positive Signal for Investors
For investors, this development is a welcome step. Passive breaches, while not the result of mismanagement, can still expose portfolios to unintended risk. By mandating consistent timelines for rectifying such breaches, SEBI ensures that fund portfolios remain aligned with their stated objectives and risk parameters.
This move is also in line with SEBI’s recent series of regulatory reforms focused on increasing investor trust, transparency, and accountability in the mutual fund industry. Over the past year, SEBI has introduced several measures to enhance scheme disclosures, tighten risk management frameworks, and improve governance structures within AMCs.
Conclusion
SEBI’s clarification on the treatment of passive breaches underscores its proactive regulatory stance in safeguarding investor interests and strengthening mutual fund governance. As India’s mutual fund industry continues to grow—both in terms of assets under management and retail participation—clear and consistent regulatory guidance such as this will be essential to maintain market integrity and investor confidence.
